Peer Review Process


Each submitted manuscript is assigned to one of the appointed editors. The most important criterion for acceptance/rejection is originality of the material presented in the manuscript. Reviewers are recruited among the recognized experts relevant for the given area.

Reviewers are advised to consider the following important aspects of a manuscript when conducting the review.

1. Reporting of Original Results:

The results reported in the manuscript must be original and authentic work of the authors. They should be devoid of any plagiarism and the material should not have been published earlier. 

2. Experiments and Analyses:

Experiments and other analyses should meet the recognized technical standards and must be described systematically. The research presented in a manuscript should facilitate in reaching accurate conclusions from the statistics. 

3. Interpretation of Results:

Authors should present and interpret the results and conclusions in an appropriate and comprehensive manner, clearly explaining the results and outcomes of their study. Incomplete interpretation of results may result in rejection of the manuscript.

4. Language of Composition:

The manuscript should be written in English or in Bahasa Indonesia in a clear, direct and active style, free from grammatical errors and other linguistic inconsistencies. All pages should be numbered sequentially, facilitating the reviewing and editing of the manuscript. 

5. Manuscript Evaluation:

Evaluation of manuscripts is carried out by the journal’s Editors and the invited external peer reviewers.  After review of the manuscript, the decision is relayed to the authors, which may be categorized as:

  • Accept without changes
  • Revisions Required
  • Reject

The Editor's journal have the right to select reviewers for a particular manuscript considering the knowledge and experience of the reviewers.